Skip to main content
ETF black logo ETF black logo ETF black logo ETF black logo

Google Translate

Deep-sea fishing ban threatens economic viability of EU longline fleet

Press release

Joint ETF – Europêche press release

  • According to University researchers, all scenarios analysed since the adoption of the Regulation will undoubtedly lead to unbearable economic and job losses 
  • Despite having a negligible impact on the seabed, it is the fleet most affected by the bottom fishing ban imposed by the Commission on 9 October 2022

The Organization of Fisheries Producers of the Port of Burela and the University of Santiago de Compostela presented yesterday at the EU Sectoral Social Dialogue Committee for Sea Fisheries the devastating socio-economic impact of the EU Regulation that prohibits bottom fishing in 87 areas. The data collected by the University of Santiago de Compostela (USC) has been incorporated as a socio-economic argument in the appeal for annulment filed by the sector against this rule before the General Court of the EU in Luxembourg last December. The study demonstrates the disproportionality of the rule and the fact that the EU law was approved without the necessary socio-economic evaluation. The sector called on the Commission to rectify and change the rule as a matter of urgency without awaiting the judgment of the Court.

The EU longline fleet is mostly made of family-owned vessels (30m length) specialized in hook fishing (longline), a traditional gear that prioritizes quality over quantity. Despite its insignificant impact on the seabed, it has turned out to be the most affected gear by the EU implementing regulation banning bottom fishing in certain sea areas. The main reason lies in the fact that the general closure of areas has been adopted without taking into account the impact of each fishing gear on the seabed, an impact that this type of longline does not cause.

Professor Gonzalo Rodríguez, coordinator of the research group on fishing economics and natural resources at USC, stated that “bottom longline fleets in European waters will not be viable with the general closures imposed in this implementing regulation”. In the University study, the socioeconomic impact was evaluated and quantified in three different scenarios (i.e. best, moderate and worst case) since the entry into force of the EU Law. The reduction in catches, the evolution of inflation and its cost structure were the main elements considered, which evidenced the serious direct and indirect impact of the rule.

Particularly, it is estimated that the direct impact of the application of the new Regulation can lead to a reduction of up to 27 million euros in global turnover, with annual losses of up to 150,000 euros per year per vessel, which will cause irreversible and structural damage to the future of this fleet.

Regarding its indirect impact, these losses of the longline fleet will cause a reduction in ancillary and supplier companies, which will also see their turnover reduced by up to 17.5 million euros, with inevitable consequences for coastal communities highly dependent on fishing.

Social Partners in the fisheries sector unanimously regretted the disconnection of the European Commission from the fisheries reality. Fishing representatives called on the Commission to maintain the continuous dialogue on this topic and to redress the problem as a matter of urgency without waiting for the court ruling. The sector concluded that since this regulation creates more problems than solutions, it should be rectified before its effects become irreversible.

For further information, please contact:

               Daniel Voces, Europêche Managing Director (+32.2.230.48.48 or daniel.voces@europeche.org)

               Andrea Albertazzi, ETF Fisheries Policy Officer (+32.470.93.05.89 or a.albertazzi@etf-europe.org)

 

ON THE GROUND

News

Keeping a warming Europe moving: how hot temperatures affect transport workers and what can be done about it

As part of the European continent undergoes its fourth heatwave of 2026, it has become abundantly clear that occupational heat exposure is no longer an exceptional or occasional summer hazard. It is an emergent occupational hazard only destined to escalate. Europe is the second fastest-warming region of the globe after the Arctic. According to EU-OSHA 2025 numbers, one in five workers in the EU signaled exposure to extreme heat at work in the previous 12 months, a figure rising to one in three in some countries.
News

Unruly passengers: more than just summer headlines

Summer may be synonymous with relaxation for holidaymakers and every summer seems to produce its share of eye-catching headlines. Just days ago, The Guardian reported on a drunk British holidaymaker who tried to kiss a flight attendant on a plane and was arrested on his way back through Palma airport. A week earlier, headlines were dominated by reports of a flight from Dublin to Ibiza descending into what was described as "sex and booze chaos," leaving fellow passengers shocked.
News

UK public transport unions sound the alarm over lack of toilet access for drivers

Public transport unions in the United Kingdom are raising urgent concerns about the lack of access to toilet facilities for bus and train drivers, a problem that has persisted for years but is now reaching a breaking point. Reports from across the UK show drivers being forced to work entire shifts without guaranteed access to a toilet, leaving them to rely on improvised or unsafe alternatives, including urinating in bottles in their driving cab. Some unions are now considering industrial action to force employers and authorities to act.